Regulating element distribution to improve magnetic properties of sintered Nd–Fe–B/Tb–Fe–B composite magnets
Li Zhu-Bai1, 2, †, Zuo Jing-Yan1, Wang Dong-Shan2, Liu Fei1, 2, Zhang Xue-Feng1, 2
Key Laboratory of Integrated Exploitation of Bayan Obo Multi-Metal Resources, Inner Mongolia University of Science and Technology, Baotou 014010, China
School of Science, Inner Mongolia University of Science and Technology, Baotou 014010, China

 

† Corresponding author. E-mail: lzbgj@163.com

Abstract

Nd content was varied in B6 (x = 0, 0.5, 1, and 1.5) to optimize the magnetic properties of sintered Nd–Fe–B/Tb–Fe–B composite magnets, which were prepared by mixing 9 g of Nd–Fe–B with 1 g of Tb17Fe75B8 powder. In conventional magnets, by reducing Nd content, the coercivity of 10.4 kOe in Nd13.2Fe80.8B6 decreases to 7.2 kOe in Nd12.2Fe81.8B6; meanwhile, in Nd–Fe–B/Tb–Fe–B magnets the coercivity does not decrease when reducing Nd content. In the intergranular phase, the Tb content increases owing to the reducing Nd content of the Nd–Fe–B alloy in the sintered composite magnets. Therefore, the excess Tb in Tb17Fe75B8 enters the intergranular phase, and more Tb atoms can substitute for Nd at the grain boundary of the Nd–Fe–B phase, leading to a more significant increase in coercivity. The remanence increases with reducing Nd content, and the energy product of 39.1 MGOe with a high coercivity of 21.0 kOe is obtained in Nd12.2Fe81.8B6/Tb17Fe75B8 magnets. These investigations show that magnetic properties can be further improved by regulating the element distribution in sintered composite magnets.

1. Introduction

Nd–Fe–B magnets are essential components in many technology fields owing to their high energy product,[13] but their coercivity is relatively low and far less than the theoretical value.[4] For meeting the technology demand of hybrid/electric vehicles, it is necessary to improve the coercivity and thermal stability of Nd–Fe–B-based magnets. The grain boundary diffusion of Dy/Tb alloys could significantly improve the coercivity;[58] however, this is only suitable for small magnets. Recently, it was found that the coercivity could be enhanced and the behaviors of magnetization reversal are uniform in resource-saving magnets with dual main phases.[914] The coercivity also increases in sintered magnets prepared by the addition of Tb–Fe–B powders to Nd–Fe–B,[15] and the increase has a nearly linear relationship with the added amount of Tb–Fe–B. This effect is better than that of conventional dual-alloy methods, in which the coercivity increases very slowly and even decreases for a large amount of DyHx added to Nd–Fe–B powders.[16] Both the ultrahigh magnetocrystalline anisotropy of the Tb2Fe14B phase and Tb atomic diffusion possibly contribute to the improvement of coercivity.[15] It is noted that Nd atoms also diffuse via the intergranular phase during high-temperature sintering, and therefore Nd would substitute for Tb in the Tb2Fe14B phase, thus reducing its magnetocrystalline anisotropy. Provided that the diffusion of Nd could be suppressed and more Tb atoms substitute for Nd at the Nd–Fe–B grain boundary, as well as the ultrahigh magnetocrystalline anisotropy remaining in the Tb–Fe–B main phase, the coercivity may increase more greatly. In this paper, the content of Nd of the Nd–Fe–B alloy was varied, and the Tb content was increased in the Tb–Fe–B alloy. These are expected to regulate the element distribution for optimizing the magnetic properties in sintered Nd–Fe–B/Tb–Fe–B magnets.

2. Experiment

B6 (x = 0, 0.5, 1, and 1.5) powders, in which the content of Nd was reduced from 13.2 at.% to 11.7 at.%, were prepared by the induction melting of Nd, Fe, and Fe–B alloys, followed by hydrogen decrepitation and jet-milling. Tb17Fe75B8 powders were prepared through induction melting, hydrogen decrepitation, and ball-milling, and the Tb atomic percent, 17 at.%, was much higher than the Tb stoichiometry of 11.7 at.% in Tb2Fe14B. Nine grams of Nd–Fe–B powder was mixed with 1 g of Tb17Fe75B8 powder, and then blended for 10 min to ensure compositional uniformity. Nd–Fe–B powder and the mixture of Nd–Fe–B/Tb–Fe–B (mass ratio of 9: 1) were compressed, separately, after alignment under a 2 T pulsed magnetic field. The compacts were sintered in a vacuum at 1050–1060 °C for 2 h, followed by annealing at 510 °C for 2 h. The demagnetization curves were measured using an NIM-200 C loop tracer. X-ray diffraction measurement was performed using Co radiation to check the phase constitution. The microstructure and chemical composition were observed by a scanning electron microscope (SEM) with backscattered electrons (BSE) and an energy dispersive spectrometer (EDS), respectively.

3. Results and discussion

X-ray diffraction patterns confirm that all of the samples contain the R2Fe14B main phase (shown in Fig. 1), and the unidentified phase should be the intergranular phase.[17] There is a small amount of α-Fe phases in Nd11.7Fe82.3B6, and the rather low content of Nd and high content of Fe are ascribed to the existence of the minor phase of α-Fe. Figure 2 shows the surface micromorphology of the magnets observed by SEM with BSE. The brighter regions correspond to the intergranular phase, and the dark regions correspond to the main phase of R2Fe14B. The size of some intergranular phases is larger in the magnets with the higher Nd content, and the amount of intergranular phases decreases with the reduction in Nd content. The element distribution was inspected by EDS (shown in Fig. 3). The left panel is Nd mapping, and the right is Tb mapping. The color is brighter in regions with a high content of the corresponding element. In Nd mapping, the intergranular phase is brighter, which is consistent with the micromorphology presented in Fig. 2, thus confirming the Nd-rich characteristics of the intergranular phase. The darker regions labeled by the dotted boxes are Nd-lean regions, and these regions are brighter in the Tb mapping, thus indicating that the magnets consist of Tb-rich main phases of R2Fe14B. The area with the most Tb-rich main phases decreases with reducing Nd content. With the reduction in Nd content, the regions of the intergranular phase become a little brighter, implying an increase in Tb content in the intergranular phase.

Fig. 1. XRD patterns using Co radiation for the sintered magnets of Nd–Fe–B and Nd–Fe–B/Tb–Fe–B.
Fig. 2. The surface micromorphology of the sintered magnets of (a) Nd13.2Fe80.8B6/Tb17Fe75B8, (b) Nd12.7Fe81.3B6/Tb17Fe75B8, (c) Nd12.2Fe81.8B6/Tb17Fe75B8, and (d) Nd11.7Fe82.3B6/Tb17Fe75B8.
Fig. 3. Element mappings of Nd and Tb for magnets of (a) Nd13.2Fe80.8B6/Tb17Fe75B8, (b) Nd12.7Fe81.3B6/Tb17Fe75B8, (c) Nd12.2Fe81.8B6/Tb17Fe75B8, and (d) Nd11.7Fe82.3B6/Tb17Fe75B8.

The element contents were checked by EDS in the dual-main-phase magnets. In Figs. 2 and 3, spots 1–3 are in the main phase, and spot 4 is in the intergranular phase, near which is spot 5 in the Nd-rich main phase. The contents of Nd, Tb, and Fe are listed in Table 1. In Fig. 3(a), the content of Tb is 10.67 at.% for spot 1, less than 13.2 at.% in the master alloy, and the content of Nd is 2.23 at.%. For spot 3, the content of Tb is 2.28 at.% in the Nd-rich main phase. Although there are two main phases in the magnets, the chemical compositions are very different from those of the master alloy due to the atomic interdiffusion.[18] In the intergranular phase, the atomic ratio of Tb and Nd is 2.86: 44.77 for spot 4 (shown in Fig. 3(a)), and that increases to 4.02: 38.52 for the magnets with a Nd content of 12.2 at.% (shown in Fig. 3(d)). This fact verifies the increase in Tb content and the decrease in Nd content in the intergranular phase when reducing the Nd content of Nd–Fe–B.

Table 1.

The atomic percents of elements for spots 1–5 shown in Fig. 3.

.

The change in element distributions of Tb and Nd may affect the magnetic properties of the composite magnets. Figure 4 shows the demagnetization curves of all samples, and the magnetic properties are listed in Table 2. For the Nd13.2Fe80.8B6 magnet, the coercivity is 10.4 kOe. With the reduction in Nd content, the coercivity decreases (to 7.2 kOe in Nd12.2Fe81.8B6). The magnetic properties deteriorate for Nd11.7Fe82.3B6. The decrease in coercivity may result from the increase in defects at the grain boundary due to the reduction in rare-earth content; furthermore, due to the weak magnetic properties and the dipolar interaction, there is no demagnetization curve in the second quadrant for Nd11.7Fe82.3B6.[19] In the Nd–Fe–B/Tb–Fe–B composite magnets, the coercivities are 21.7 kOe, 21.8 kOe, 21.0 kOe, and 21.8 kOe, respectively, for Nd contents of 13.2 at.%, 12.7 at.%, 12.2 at.%, and 11.7 at.%. The addition of 1 g of Tb17Fe75B8 powder to 9 g of Nd–Fe–B powder leads to a large increase in coercivity. It is noted that unlike the effect in the conventional sintered Nd–Fe–B magnets, the reduction in Nd content does not result in a decrease in coercivity in the Nd–Fe–B/Tb–Fe–B composite magnets.

Fig. 4. The demagnetization curves for the sintered Nd–Fe–B and Nd–Fe–B/Tb–Fe–B magnets.
Table 2.

Magnetic properties of the sintered magnets at room temperature.

.

During the high-temperature sintering, the main phase of R2Fe14B is in the solid phase, and the intergranular phase is in the liquid phase due to its low melting point, which is the main path for atomic diffusion. For decreasing Nd content of Nd–Fe–B, the amount of free Nd atoms decreases, giving rise to an increase in the active energy for Nd diffusion. Therefore, Nd atomic diffusion is weakened, and the excess Tb atoms in Tb17Fe75B8 diffuse into the intergranular liquid phase. The increase in Tb content in the intergranular phase would promote the substitution for Nd at the grain boundary to form the (Nd,Tb)2Fe14B phase,[20] leading to an increase in the magnetocrystalline anisotropy at the grain outer-layer; therefore, the nucleation of the reversed domain is improved in the sintered magnets.[21] This may be the main reason why the coercivity is significantly more enhanced in the sintered Nd–Fe–B/Tb–Fe–B magnets for reducing Nd content. For a rather low Nd content in Nd11.7Fe82.3B6/Tb17Fe75B8, the squareness of the demagnetization curve decreases. With the reduction in Nd content from 13.2 at.% to 12.2 at.%, both the remanence and the maximum energy product increase. The increase in remanence should result from the enhanced saturation magnetization due to the increase in Fe content in the alloys with low Nd. Furthermore, the energy product of 39.1 MGOe is the largest in Nd12.2Fe81.8B6/Tb17Fe75B8 magnets with a coercivity of 21.0 kOe. The increase in coercivity of 13.8 kOe in Nd12.2Fe81.8B6/Tb17Fe75B8 (Tb content of about 1.5 at%) is much larger than the increase of 4.1 kOe in conventional R13.5Tb1.5Fe78B7 magnets prepared by adding 1.5 at% Tb directly into Nd–Fe–B;[22] it is also larger than the increase of 8.2 kOe for 4 wt.% Tb addition in (Nd,Pr)–Fe–B.[23] As nanocomposite magnets,[24] the sintered dual-main-phase magnets bear better magnetic properties than the conventional sintered (Nd,Tb)–Fe–B magnets.

The coercivity originates from the magnetocrystalline anisotropy in R2Fe14B permanent magnets. Figure 5 shows the magnetization curves measured along the hard and easy magnetization axes, respectively, for these sintered Nd–Fe–B/Tb–Fe–B magnets. The magnetocrystalline anisotropy could be obtained by the intersection of the extension lines of experimental data;[25] they are 91.1 kOe, 89.2 kOe, 87.3 kOe, and 83.9 kOe, respectively, for the magnets with Nd contents of 13.2 at.%, 12.7% at.%, 12.2% at.%, and 11.7% at.%. The anisotropy field should be the average value, since the microstructure is inhomogeneous and the magnetic properties are different in different regions in the sintered magnets. Although the average anisotropy decreases with the reduction in Nd content, the coercivity does not decrease in the sintered Nd–Fe–B/Tb–Fe–B magnets. This result verifies that the larger increase in coercivity originates from the change in anisotropy in the local region. Magnetic properties could be enhanced by tuning the interfacial chemistry.[26] In this paper, the approach to improve the coercivity is made more practical by regulating the composition and the atomic diffusion. By modifying the microstructure,[27,28] further improvement of coercivity and energy product could be anticipated in the sintered composite magnets.

Fig. 5. The magnetization curves in the directions of easy and hard magnetization axes, and the linear extension of the experimental data up to the intersection.
4. Conclusion

In summary, the high coercivity is obtained in Nd–Fe–B/Tb–Fe–B composite magnets, and the Nd content in the Nd–Fe–B alloy is varied to regulate the element distribution. For reducing Nd content of the Nd–Fe–B alloy, the content of Tb increases in the intergranular phase, which may promote Tb substitution for Nd, thus leading to a larger increase in the anisotropy at the grain boundary. Therefore, with reducing Nd content, the coercivity, despite decreasing in the conventional Nd–Fe–B magnets, does not decrease in the sintered Nd–Fe–B/Tb–Fe–B composite magnets, and both the remanence and energy product increase. The magnetic properties in the magnets prepared by mixing Nd–Fe–B and Tb–Fe–B powders are better than those of conventional sintered (Nd,Tb)–Fe–B magnets. Further improvement of magnetic properties could be expected in sintered composite magnets by optimizing the atomic diffusion and the microstructure.

Reference
[1] Sagawa M Fujimura S Togawa N Yamamoto H Matsuura Y 1984 J. Appl. Phys. 55 2083
[2] Sugimoto S 2011 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 44 064001
[3] Cai L W Guo S Ding G F Chen R J Liu J Lee D Yan A R 2015 Chin. Phys. B 24 097505
[4] Kronmüller H Durst K D Sagawa M 1988 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 74 291
[5] Watanabe N Itakura M Kuwano N Li D Suzuki S Machida K 2007 Mater. Trans. 48 915
[6] Sepehri-Amin H Ohkubo T Hono K 2010 J. Appl. Phys. 107 09A745
[7] Ma T Y Wang X J Liu X L Wu C Yan M 2015 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 48 215001
[8] Wang Z X Ju J Y Wang J Z Yin W Z Chen R J Li M Jin C X Tang X Lee D Yan A 2016 Sci. Rep. 6 38335
[9] Zhu M G Li W Wang J D Zheng L Y Li Y F Zhang K Feng H B Liu T 2014 IEEE Trans. Magn. 50 1000104
[10] Zhang X F Lan J T Li Z B Liu Y L Zhang L L Li Y F Zhao Q 2016 Chin. Phys. B 25 057502
[11] Liu D Zhao T Y Li R Zhang M Shang R X Xiong J F Zhang J Sun J R Shen B G 2017 AIP Adv. 7 056201
[12] Jin J Ma T Zhang Y Bai G Yan M 2016 Sci. Rep. 6 32200
[13] Xiong J F Shang R X Liu Y L Zhao X Zuo W L Hu F X Sun J R Zhao T Y Chen R J Shen B G 2018 Chin. Phys. B 27 077504
[14] Zhang Y J Ma T Y Yan M Jin J Y Wu B Peng B X Liu Y S Yue M Liu C Y 2018 Acta Mater. 146 97
[15] Wang D S Li Z B Liu F Ma Q Li Y F Zhao Q Zhang X F 2018 Mater. Lett. 228 509
[16] Wang C G Yue M Zhang D T Liu W Q Zhang J X 2016 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 404 64
[17] Sagawa M Fujimura S Yamamoto H Matsuura Y Hiraga K 1984 IEEE Trans. Magn. 20 1584
[18] Zhang L L Li Z B Zhang X F Ma Q Liu Y L Li Y F Zhao Q 2017 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 50 065001
[19] Liu J Sepehri-Amin H Ohkubo T Hioki K Hattori A Schrefl T Hono K 2013 Act Mater. 61 5387
[20] Liu X B Altounian Z 2012 J. Appl. Phys. 111 07A701
[21] Herbst J F 1991 Rev. Mod. Phys. 63 819
[22] Hu Z H Lian F Z Zhu M G Li W 2008 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 320 1735
[23] Lukin A A Kol’chugina N B Burkhanov G S Klyueva N E Skotnitseva K 2013 Inorg. Mater. Appl.: Research 4 256
[24] Li H L Li X H Guo D F Lou L Li W Zhang X Y 2016 Nano Lett. 16 5631
[25] Li Z Liu W Zha S Li Y Wang Y Zhang D Yue M Zhang J Huang X 2015 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 393 551
[26] Li H L Lou L Hou F C Guo D F Li W Li X H Gunderov D V Sato K Zhang X Y 2013 Appl. Phys. Lett. 103 142406
[27] Kim T H Lee S R Bae K H Kim H J Lee M W Jang T S 2017 Acta Mater. 133 200
[28] Hono K Sepehri-Amin H 2018 Scr. Mater. 154 277